Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-900ER vs. Embraer E175

vs.
Compare

737-900ER

vs.

E175

Price (USD)
$102 Million$28 Million
First Flight
20062003
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
42 m138 ft
31 m103 ft
Wingspan
34 m112 ft
26 m85 ft
Wing Area
124 m²1,341 ft²
72 m²782 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
2 m9 ft
Height
12 m41 ft
9 m32 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
85,100 kg187,613 lbs
40,400 kg89,067 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56General Electric GE34
Max Thrust Per Engine
126 kN28,400 lbf
63 kN14,200 lbf
Max Total Thrust
252 kN56,800 lbf
126 kN28,400 lbf
Fuel Capacity
29,700 l7,846 gal
11,625 l3,071 gal
Range
5,900 km3,186 nm
4,074 km2,200 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
797 km/h495 mph
Typical Seating
180 pax78 pax
Max Seating
215 pax88 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-900ER and Embraer E175

Boeing 737-900ER vs Embraer E175 Size Comparison

  • At 42.10 meters, the Boeing 737-900ER is 10.40 meters longer than the Embraer E175.
  • With a wingspan of 34.30 meters, the Boeing 737-900ER is 8.30 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER and Embraer E175 have heights of 12.60 meters and 9.90 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-900ER 2.70 meters taller.

Boeing 737-900ER vs Embraer E175 Range

  • Boeing 737-900ER’s range of 5,900 kilometers is greater than Embraer E175’s range of 4,074 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 737-900ER can fly nonstop approximately 1,826 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER can hold 7,846 gallons of fuel, which is 4,775 gallons more than the Embraer E175’s tank capacity of 3,071 gallons.

Boeing 737-900ER vs Embraer E175 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-900ER can accommodate 180 passengers, which is about 102 passengers more than Embraer E175’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER’s max seating capacity is 215 passengers, compared to 88 passengers of the Embraer E175.

About the Boeing 737-900ER

Introduced in 2006, the Boeing 737-900ER is a pivotal variant in the Next-Generation 737 series, offering airlines an ideal combination of extended range and increased passenger capacity for medium to long-haul routes. This aircraft, building upon the base model of the 737-900, incorporates significant advancements that enhance its operational flexibility and efficiency.

The 737-900ER's design extends to a length of 42.1 meters (138.1 feet), making it one of the longest aircraft in the 737 family. This extended fuselage allows for a higher passenger capacity, aligning with the growing demands for more economically efficient, high-density configurations in commercial aviation. Its wingspan of 34.3 meters (112.6 feet) and a wing area of 124.6 square meters (1341.0 square feet) contribute to the aircraft's aerodynamic performance. Equipped with powerful engines providing a total maximum thrust of 252.0 kN (56,800 lbf), the 737-900ER is well-suited for extended range operations, further enhancing its versatility for various route profiles. With a fuel capacity of 29,700 liters (7,846 US gallons), the aircraft achieves a range of approximately 5,900 kilometers (3,186 nautical miles), enabling it to operate longer routes previously beyond the reach of standard single-aisle aircraft.

The interior of the 737-900ER is configured to accommodate up to 180 passengers in a typical two-class setting, with the capability to seat up to 215 passengers in a denser, single-class arrangement. This flexibility makes the 737-900ER an adaptable solution for airlines to cater to different market demands. The cabin design focuses on enhancing passenger comfort, integrating modern amenities and spacious seating arrangements.

In the competitive landscape of commercial aviation, the 737-900ER stands out as a cost-effective option for airlines to service a wide spectrum of domestic and international routes. Operators such as Alaska Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and United Airlines have integrated the 737-900ER into their fleets, utilizing its operational efficiency and capacity to bolster and diversify their route networks. The closest alternative airliner to the 737-900ER in the Airbus A321neo.

Overall, the Boeing 737-900ER marks a significant evolution in the 737 series, bringing together the benefits of extended range and increased capacity while upholding the operational efficiency and reliability that the Next-Generation 737s are known for. Its role in the fleets of global airlines underscores its status as a versatile and efficient choice for medium to long-haul air travel.

About the Embraer E175

The Embraer E175, a member of the E-Jet family, is a narrow-body regional jet introduced in 2003. This aircraft was designed as part of Embraer's strategy to offer diverse solutions in the regional jet market, with a focus on balancing operational efficiency and passenger comfort for short to medium-haul routes.

The E175 extends 31.7 meters (103.9 feet) in length, slightly longer than its predecessor, the E170. This additional length allows for increased seating capacity, accommodating up to 88 passengers. The wingspan of 26.0 meters (85.3 feet) and a wing area of 72.7 square meters (782.8 square feet) contribute to the aircraft's optimized aerodynamic performance, particularly beneficial for operations in varied regional environments.

Equipped with two GE engines providing a combined thrust of 126.0 kN (28,400 lbf), the E175 has an enhanced range of approximately 4,074 kilometers (2,200 nautical miles). This range, coupled with the aircraft's efficient fuel consumption, positions the E175 as an attractive option for airlines to connect regional destinations effectively. The E175's interior is designed with an emphasis on passenger experience, featuring comfortable seating, larger windows, and modern in-flight entertainment systems. The layout is also tailored for quick boarding and disembarking, aligning with the operational needs of regional air travel.

In the regional aircraft market, the Embraer E175 competes with Bombardier's CRJ-900. This segment was previously occupied by the earlier BAe 146 and Fokker 70. The E175's introduction provided airlines with a versatile aircraft that combines the comfort and amenities of larger jets with the economics and flexibility of regional operations. Airlines operating the Embraer E175 include American Eagle, Delta Connection, and Republic Airways. These carriers have incorporated the E175 into their fleets to serve diverse regional routes, taking advantage of its operational efficiency, range, and passenger appeal. The aircraft's role in these fleets demonstrates its adaptability to various route structures and its capacity to offer a comfortable travel experience on regional journeys. As of 2023, the E175 is still in production, with strong demand from regional carriers in the US.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.