Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-900ER vs. ATR 42-600

vs.
Compare

737-900ER

vs.

42-600

Price (USD)
$102 Million$20 Million
First Flight
20061984
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
42 m138 ft
22 m74 ft
Wingspan
34 m112 ft
24 m80 ft
Wing Area
124 m²1,341 ft²
54 m²586 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
12 m41 ft
7 m24 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
85,100 kg187,613 lbs
18,600 kg41,006 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
126 kN28,400 lbf
1,800 kW2,400 shp
Max Total Thrust
252 kN56,800 lbf
3,600 kW4,800 shp
Fuel Capacity
29,700 l7,846 gal
5,730 l1,514 gal
Range
5,900 km3,186 nm
1,326 km716 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
556 km/h345 mph
Typical Seating
180 pax44 pax
Max Seating
215 pax50 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-900ER and ATR 42-600

Boeing 737-900ER vs ATR 42-600 Size Comparison

  • At 42.10 meters, the Boeing 737-900ER is 19.40 meters longer than the ATR 42-600.
  • With a wingspan of 34.30 meters, the Boeing 737-900ER is 9.70 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER and ATR 42-600 have heights of 12.60 meters and 7.60 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-900ER 5 meters taller.

Boeing 737-900ER vs ATR 42-600 Range

  • Boeing 737-900ER’s range of 5,900 kilometers is greater than ATR 42-600’s range of 1,326 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 737-900ER can fly nonstop approximately 4,574 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER can hold 7,846 gallons of fuel, which is 6,332 gallons more than the ATR 42-600’s tank capacity of 1,514 gallons.

Boeing 737-900ER vs ATR 42-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-900ER can accommodate 180 passengers, which is about 136 passengers more than ATR 42-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER’s max seating capacity is 215 passengers, compared to 50 passengers of the ATR 42-600.

About the Boeing 737-900ER

Introduced in 2006, the Boeing 737-900ER is a pivotal variant in the Next-Generation 737 series, offering airlines an ideal combination of extended range and increased passenger capacity for medium to long-haul routes. This aircraft, building upon the base model of the 737-900, incorporates significant advancements that enhance its operational flexibility and efficiency.

The 737-900ER's design extends to a length of 42.1 meters (138.1 feet), making it one of the longest aircraft in the 737 family. This extended fuselage allows for a higher passenger capacity, aligning with the growing demands for more economically efficient, high-density configurations in commercial aviation. Its wingspan of 34.3 meters (112.6 feet) and a wing area of 124.6 square meters (1341.0 square feet) contribute to the aircraft's aerodynamic performance. Equipped with powerful engines providing a total maximum thrust of 252.0 kN (56,800 lbf), the 737-900ER is well-suited for extended range operations, further enhancing its versatility for various route profiles. With a fuel capacity of 29,700 liters (7,846 US gallons), the aircraft achieves a range of approximately 5,900 kilometers (3,186 nautical miles), enabling it to operate longer routes previously beyond the reach of standard single-aisle aircraft.

The interior of the 737-900ER is configured to accommodate up to 180 passengers in a typical two-class setting, with the capability to seat up to 215 passengers in a denser, single-class arrangement. This flexibility makes the 737-900ER an adaptable solution for airlines to cater to different market demands. The cabin design focuses on enhancing passenger comfort, integrating modern amenities and spacious seating arrangements.

In the competitive landscape of commercial aviation, the 737-900ER stands out as a cost-effective option for airlines to service a wide spectrum of domestic and international routes. Operators such as Alaska Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and United Airlines have integrated the 737-900ER into their fleets, utilizing its operational efficiency and capacity to bolster and diversify their route networks. The closest alternative airliner to the 737-900ER in the Airbus A321neo.

Overall, the Boeing 737-900ER marks a significant evolution in the 737 series, bringing together the benefits of extended range and increased capacity while upholding the operational efficiency and reliability that the Next-Generation 737s are known for. Its role in the fleets of global airlines underscores its status as a versatile and efficient choice for medium to long-haul air travel.

About the ATR 42-600

The ATR 42-600 is a twin-engine, turboprop aircraft is designed for regional travel. Its role in the aviation industry focuses on connecting regional and remote areas, making air travel accessible to smaller communities. The ATR 42 is most recognizable by its high-wing design , T-tail, and propeller engines.

The ATR 42 was originally introduced in 1984, with the -600 variant beginning flight in 2010. The -600 comes in at 22.7 meters (74.4 feet) long with a wingspan of 24.6 meters (80.6 feet). Its wing area of 54.5 square meters (586.6 square feet) is designed to provide efficient lift for short-runway takeoffs and landings. With a typical seating arrangement for 44 passengers, the ATR 42-600 is an optimal choice for airlines serving regional routes with lower passenger volumes. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney Canada PW120s, the aircraft delivers a total output of 3222 kW (4,320 shp), ensuring reliable performance for its operational requirements. The ATR 42-600 has a fuel capacity of 5,730 liters (1,514 US gallons), contributing to its range of 1,326 kilometers (716 nautical miles). Its cruise speed of 556 km/h (345 mph) enables efficient travel times for regional connections.

In the competitive landscape of regional aviation, the ATR 42-600 contends with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400, Fokker 50, an Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia. Its appeal lies in its operational efficiency and suitability for short-haul routes, particularly in regions where larger jet aircraft are not viable. Airlines that have integrated the ATR 42-600 into their fleets include Silver Airways and Logan Air. These carriers utilize the aircraft to serve regional networks, capitalizing on its capacity to operate efficiently on shorter routes and provide essential connectivity.

The development of the ATR 42-600 was driven by the growing need for efficient, reliable aircraft in the regional market. Its introduction into service has been instrumental in expanding the reach of air travel to smaller markets, underscoring the importance of regional connectivity in the broader aviation industry.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.