Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-900ER vs. Airbus A319

vs.
Compare

737-900ER

vs.

A319

Price (USD)
$102 Million$92 Million
First Flight
20061995
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
42 m138 ft
33 m111 ft
Wingspan
34 m112 ft
35 m117 ft
Wing Area
124 m²1,341 ft²
122 m²1,317 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
4 m13 ft
Height
12 m41 ft
11 m38 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
85,100 kg187,613 lbs
75,500 kg166,449 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56CFMI CFM56 / IAE V2500
Max Thrust Per Engine
126 kN28,400 lbf
120 kN27,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
252 kN56,800 lbf
240 kN54,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
29,700 l7,846 gal
30,190 l7,975 gal
Range
5,900 km3,186 nm
6,950 km3,753 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
830 km/h516 mph
Typical Seating
180 pax140 pax
Max Seating
215 pax156 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-900ER and Airbus A319

Boeing 737-900ER vs Airbus A319 Size Comparison

  • At 42.10 meters, the Boeing 737-900ER is 8.30 meters longer than the Airbus A319.
  • With a wingspan of 35.80 meters, the Airbus A319 is 1.50 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER and Airbus A319 have heights of 12.60 meters and 11.80 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-900ER 0.80 meters taller.

Boeing 737-900ER vs Airbus A319 Range

  • Airbus A319’s range of 6,950 kilometers is greater than Boeing 737-900ER’s range of 5,900 kilometers. Therefore, the Airbus A319 can fly nonstop approximately 1,050 kilometers further.
  • The Airbus A319 can hold 7,975 gallons of fuel, which is 129 gallons more than the Boeing 737-900ER’s tank capacity of 7,846 gallons.

Boeing 737-900ER vs Airbus A319 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-900ER can accommodate 180 passengers, which is about 40 passengers more than Airbus A319’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER’s max seating capacity is 215 passengers, compared to 156 passengers of the Airbus A319.

About the Boeing 737-900ER

Introduced in 2006, the Boeing 737-900ER is a pivotal variant in the Next-Generation 737 series, offering airlines an ideal combination of extended range and increased passenger capacity for medium to long-haul routes. This aircraft, building upon the base model of the 737-900, incorporates significant advancements that enhance its operational flexibility and efficiency.

The 737-900ER's design extends to a length of 42.1 meters (138.1 feet), making it one of the longest aircraft in the 737 family. This extended fuselage allows for a higher passenger capacity, aligning with the growing demands for more economically efficient, high-density configurations in commercial aviation. Its wingspan of 34.3 meters (112.6 feet) and a wing area of 124.6 square meters (1341.0 square feet) contribute to the aircraft's aerodynamic performance. Equipped with powerful engines providing a total maximum thrust of 252.0 kN (56,800 lbf), the 737-900ER is well-suited for extended range operations, further enhancing its versatility for various route profiles. With a fuel capacity of 29,700 liters (7,846 US gallons), the aircraft achieves a range of approximately 5,900 kilometers (3,186 nautical miles), enabling it to operate longer routes previously beyond the reach of standard single-aisle aircraft.

The interior of the 737-900ER is configured to accommodate up to 180 passengers in a typical two-class setting, with the capability to seat up to 215 passengers in a denser, single-class arrangement. This flexibility makes the 737-900ER an adaptable solution for airlines to cater to different market demands. The cabin design focuses on enhancing passenger comfort, integrating modern amenities and spacious seating arrangements.

In the competitive landscape of commercial aviation, the 737-900ER stands out as a cost-effective option for airlines to service a wide spectrum of domestic and international routes. Operators such as Alaska Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and United Airlines have integrated the 737-900ER into their fleets, utilizing its operational efficiency and capacity to bolster and diversify their route networks. The closest alternative airliner to the 737-900ER in the Airbus A321neo.

Overall, the Boeing 737-900ER marks a significant evolution in the 737 series, bringing together the benefits of extended range and increased capacity while upholding the operational efficiency and reliability that the Next-Generation 737s are known for. Its role in the fleets of global airlines underscores its status as a versatile and efficient choice for medium to long-haul air travel.

About the Airbus A319

The Airbus A319, a member of the renowned Airbus A320 family, is a narrow-body, twin-engine jetliner designed for short to medium-haul routes. Launched in the mid-1990s, the A319 was developed as a shorter variant of the A320, offering airlines a versatile aircraft for routes with lower passenger demand, without sacrificing range and efficiency.

With a length of 111 feet (33.8 meters) and a wingspan of 111.9 feet (34.1 meters), the A319 is more compact than the A320, allowing for greater flexibility in airport operations, particularly in constrained or noise-sensitive environments. The aircraft typically accommodates around 140 passengers in a standard two-class configuration, though it can be configured for up to 160 passengers in a high-density layout. Powered by either CFM56-5B or IAE V2500 engines, the A319 delivers efficient performance, supporting a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 166,000 lbs. The aircraft's range extends up to 3,750 nautical miles, depending on the variant and configuration, allowing for considerable route flexibility, including transcontinental operations. The A319 shares the same pioneering technology as its A320 family counterparts, including Airbus's fly-by-wire control system and an advanced glass cockpit. These features not only enhance operational efficiency and safety but also ensure commonality across the A320 family, reducing training and maintenance costs for airlines.

Airlines around the world have incorporated the Airbus A319 into their fleets, valuing its combination of efficiency, capacity, and range. Operators such as EasyJet, American Airlines, and Lufthansa have deployed the A319 across a wide spectrum of routes, taking advantage of its ability to efficiently serve both short-haul and longer regional operations. The Airbus A319's introduction to the market underscored Airbus's commitment to providing a diverse range of aircraft to meet various airline needs. Its role in the A320 family is characterized by its ability to offer the same advanced technology and performance in a smaller, more versatile package.

The A319 continues to be a significant player in the narrow-body aircraft market, demonstrating its ongoing relevance in the commercial aviation industry. Its versatility and efficiency make it a valuable asset for airlines seeking to optimize their operations and provide quality air travel experiences.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.