Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-900 vs. Boeing 767-200ER

vs.
Compare

737-900

vs.

767-200ER

Price (USD)
$102 Million$89 Million
First Flight
20001984
Body Type
Narrow-bodyWide-body
Length
42 m138 ft
48 m159 ft
Wingspan
34 m112 ft
47 m156 ft
Wing Area
124 m²1,341 ft²
283 m²3,049 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
5 m16 ft
Height
12 m41 ft
15 m51 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
79,000 kg174,165 lbs
179,200 kg395,068 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56P&W PW4000, JT8D / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211
Max Thrust Per Engine
121 kN27,300 lbf
270 kN60,600 lbf
Max Total Thrust
242 kN54,600 lbf
540 kN121,200 lbf
Fuel Capacity
26,000 l6,868 gal
91,380 l24,140 gal
Range
5,100 km2,754 nm
12,200 km6,587 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
850 km/h528 mph
Typical Seating
177 pax216 pax
Max Seating
189 pax290 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-900 and Boeing 767-200ER

Boeing 737-900 vs Boeing 767-200ER Size Comparison

  • At 48.50 meters, the Boeing 767-200ER is 6.40 meters longer than the Boeing 737-900.
  • With a wingspan of 47.60 meters, the Boeing 767-200ER is 13.30 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-900 and Boeing 767-200ER have heights of 12.60 meters and 15.80 meters respectively - making the Boeing 767-200ER 3.20 meters taller.

Boeing 737-900 vs Boeing 767-200ER Range

  • Boeing 767-200ER’s range of 12,200 kilometers is greater than Boeing 737-900’s range of 5,100 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 767-200ER can fly nonstop approximately 7,100 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 767-200ER can hold 24,140 gallons of fuel, which is 17,272 gallons more than the Boeing 737-900’s tank capacity of 6,868 gallons.

Boeing 737-900 vs Boeing 767-200ER Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-200ER can accommodate 216 passengers, which is about 39 passengers more than Boeing 737-900’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 767-200ER’s max seating capacity is 290 passengers, compared to 189 passengers of the Boeing 737-900.

About the Boeing 737-900

The Boeing 737-900, a member of the 737 Next Generation (NG) series, was introduced in the year 2000 as a response to airline demand for an aircraft with higher capacity within the narrow-body market. This B739 model, part of Boeing's continuous innovation in the 737 series, was designed to provide an efficient solution for medium to long-range flights.

At 138.1 feet (42.1 meters) in length and 112.6 feet (34.3 meters) in wingspan, the 737-900 is notable for its extended fuselage, allowing for an increased passenger capacity. It typically accommodates 177 passengers in a two-class layout, with an economy class configured in a 6 abreast seat arrangement. The aircraft's interior design focuses on passenger comfort and space utilization, adapting to the requirements of both airlines and passengers. The 737-900 is equipped with two CFM International CFM56-7B27 engines, resulting in a combined thrust of 54,600 lbf (242.0 kN). Along with a fuel capacity of 6,868 US gallons (26,000 liters), the aircraft has a range of approximately 2,753 nautical miles (5,100 kilometers).

In its segment, the Boeing 737-900 competes with similar aircraft like the Airbus A321. Its introduction to the market was part of Boeing's strategy to expand the capabilities of the 737 family, addressing the evolving needs of the airline industry for larger single-aisle aircraft. Airlines such as Alaska Airlines, United Airlines, Turkish Airlines, and Korean Air have incorporated the Boeing 737-900 into their fleets. These carriers favor the -900 for its versatility, as it can operate both domestic and international routes. With the more recent MAX family of 737s in production, the many -900s will be replaced by the 737 MAX 9. Currently, the average age of a -900 is approximately 20 years. Many airlines have started ordering the newer MAX 9 in preparation for retirement of the older 739.

The Boeing 737-900's production history and widespread use among airlines signify its role in the development of modern air travel. While it shares commonalities with other models in the 737 NG series, its distinct capacity and range set it apart, highlighting Boeing's adaptability in responding to market trends and airline requirements.

About the Boeing 767-200ER

Introduced in 1984, the Boeing 767-200ER (Extended Range) is a twin engine, wide-body commercial aircraft that represents an advanced variant of the original 767-200. This updated version was designed to offer enhanced range and capacity in the long-haul market. The -200ER spearheaded the growth of Transatlantic twinjet flights under Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards (ETOPS) regulations.

The 767-200ER features a length of 48.5 meters (159.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet). With a wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet), the aircraft is engineered to provide a balance of aerodynamic efficiency and structural capability, accommodating long-range flights with a substantial payload. One of the distinctive aspects of the 767-200ER is its extended range capability, with a total fuel capacity of 91,380 liters (24,140 US gallons), facilitating a range of up to 12,200 kilometers (6,587 nautical miles). This extended range makes the aircraft particularly suited for intercontinental routes, allowing airlines to operate non-stop flights over longer distances. The aircraft is powered by a choice of high-thrust engines from manufacturers like Pratt & Whitney, General Electric, and Rolls-Royce. These engines provide a total maximum thrust of 540.0 kN (121,200 lbf), contributing to the 767-200ER's performance in extended-range operations.

In terms of passenger capacity, the 767-200ER typically accommodates around 216 passengers in a dual-class configuration. This layout often includes a business class with more spacious seating and a larger economy class in a twin-aisle, 2-3-2 arrangement. The maximum capacity of the aircraft can reach up to 290 passengers, depending on the airline's specific configuration. Competing in the market against other wide-body aircraft such as the Airbus A300 and A310, the 767-200ER carved out a niche for itself in the long-haul segment. Its introduction was timely, aligning with the increasing globalization of air travel and the need for more efficient, long-range aircraft. Notable airlines that have operated the Boeing 767-200ER include Delta Air Lines, American Airlines, and United Airlines.

In summary, the Boeing 767-200ER stands as a significant development in Boeing's 767 series, offering airlines a combination of extended range, capacity, and operational efficiency. Beyond its use for passenger flights, the 767 has been an important aircraft for both freight and military operations.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.