Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-600 vs. Boeing 757-300

vs.
Compare

737-600

vs.

757-300

Price (USD)
$57 Million$81 Million
First Flight
19981998
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
31 m102 ft
54 m178 ft
Wingspan
34 m112 ft
38 m124 ft
Wing Area
124 m²1,341 ft²
185 m²1,994 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
3 m12 ft
Height
12 m41 ft
13 m44 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
66,000 kg145,505 lbs
123,800 kg272,932 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56Rolls-Royce RB211 / Pratt & Whitney PW2000
Max Thrust Per Engine
101 kN22,700 lbf
193 kN43,500 lbf
Max Total Thrust
202 kN45,400 lbf
387 kN87,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
26,000 l6,868 gal
43,400 l11,465 gal
Range
5,650 km3,051 nm
6,295 km3,399 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
850 km/h528 mph
Typical Seating
123 pax262 pax
Max Seating
149 pax295 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-600 and Boeing 757-300

Boeing 737-600 vs Boeing 757-300 Size Comparison

  • At 54.40 meters, the Boeing 757-300 is 23.20 meters longer than the Boeing 737-600.
  • With a wingspan of 38 meters, the Boeing 757-300 is 3.70 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-600 and Boeing 757-300 have heights of 12.60 meters and 13.60 meters respectively - making the Boeing 757-300 1 meters taller.

Boeing 737-600 vs Boeing 757-300 Range

  • Boeing 757-300’s range of 6,295 kilometers is greater than Boeing 737-600’s range of 5,650 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 757-300 can fly nonstop approximately 645 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 757-300 can hold 11,465 gallons of fuel, which is 4,597 gallons more than the Boeing 737-600’s tank capacity of 6,868 gallons.

Boeing 737-600 vs Boeing 757-300 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 757-300 can accommodate 262 passengers, which is about 139 passengers more than Boeing 737-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 757-300’s max seating capacity is 295 passengers, compared to 149 passengers of the Boeing 737-600.

About the Boeing 737-600

Launched in 1998, the Boeing 737-600 is the smallest aircraft in the 737 Next Generation (NG) series. It succeeded the 737-500, and was a significant evolution in Boeing's narrow-body offerings. It featured many upgraded features from the previous 737s, including aerodynamics, engines, and avionics. As the smallest NG variant, the 737-600 was designed for efficiency and adaptability, catering to airlines requiring a compact jet for short to medium-haul routes.

This aircraft extends 102.4 feet (31.2 meters) in length with a wingspan of 112.6 feet (34.3 meters). The 737-600, with a typical seating capacity for 123 passengers, offers an ideal balance between passenger comfort and efficiency, making it a fitting choice for airlines serving routes with moderate passenger demand. Equipped with two CFM International CFM56-7B20 engines, the 737-600 has a total thrust of 45,400 lbf (202.0 kN). This engine power, coupled with a fuel capacity of 6,868 US gallons (26,000 liters), gives the -600 a range of 3,051 nautical miles (5,650 kilometers). The 737-600 has a cruise speed of 528 mph (850 km/h) enabling airlines to maintain efficient and swift operations, particularly beneficial for regional network connections.

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the Boeing 737-600 competed with aircraft such as the Airbus A318 and Bombardier CRJ series, offering airlines a modern alternative in the narrow-body market. Airlines including Scandinavian Airlines (SAS), Westjet, and Air Algerie operated the Boeing 737-600. Ultimately, the -600 variant was not a popular model of the 737 due to its economics. The -700, only slightly heavier, had a much greater payload. Additionally, the larger market was moving more towards higher capacity narrow-bodies with lower unit costs and greater revenue opportunities.

About the Boeing 757-300

The Boeing 757-300, an extended variant of the popular 757 series, is a narrow-body, twin engine aircraft serving medium-long haul routes. As a stretched version of the 757-200, the 757-300 was designed to accommodate a higher passenger capacity while maintaining the series' operational efficiency and versatility. The B753 entered the commercial aviation market in 1998 with the German airline Condor.

Sometimes referred to as the "flying pencil", the 757-300 has a rather long and skinny fuselage. It measures in at over 54 meters (178 feet), making it the longest, single-aisle twinjet ever built. The wingspan remains at 38.0 meters (124.7 feet), and the wing area is 185.3 square meters (1994.0 square feet), consistent with the 757 series design. The extended fuselage of the 757-300 allows it to carry a larger number of passengers, enhancing its appeal for airlines looking to maximize capacity on popular routes.

The typical seating arrangement in the 757-300 is designed to accommodate about 262 passengers. This configuration usually includes a dual-class layout, with the majority of the cabin dedicated to economy class in a 3-3 seat configuration, alongside a smaller business class section. This layout enables airlines to optimize the balance between passenger comfort and density, making the aircraft particularly suitable for high-demand, medium-range routes.

Powered by Rolls-Royce RB211s or Pratt & Whitney PW2043s the 757-300 is capable of delivering a maximum thrust of 387.0 kN (87,000 lbf), the Boeing 757-300 offers a range of approximately 6,295 kilometers (3,399 nautical miles). This range, combined with its passenger capacity, positions the 757-300 as a competitive option for airlines operating busy domestic and transcontinental routes.

In the market, the Boeing 757-300 faced competition from similar narrow-body aircraft, such as variants from the Airbus A321 series and the McDonnell Douglas MD-90. These aircraft offered comparable range and capacity, creating a competitive landscape in the segment of extended narrow-body airliners. Production for the 757-300 totaled just 55 aircraft. Airlines that have incorporated the Boeing 757-300 into their fleets include Continental Airlines (now merged with United Airlines), Delta Air Lines, and Icelandair. These carriers have utilized the aircraft's unique combination of capacity and range to efficiently serve a mix of domestic and international routes, underscoring the 757-300's utility in commercial aviation.

The Boeing 757-300, while not as widely produced as its shorter counterpart, the 757-200, still marks an important development in the evolution of the 757 series. Its extended fuselage and increased capacity cater to specific market needs, demonstrating Boeing's adaptability in responding to evolving airline requirements. As a variant of one of the most recognizable narrow-body aircraft families, the 757-300 continues to play a role in the global aviation industry, particularly in markets where capacity and efficiency are paramount.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.