Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-400 vs. Embraer E190

vs.
Compare

737-400

vs.

E190

Price (USD)
$50 Million$32 Million
First Flight
19882004
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
36 m119 ft
36 m118 ft
Wingspan
28 m94 ft
28 m94 ft
Wing Area
105 m²1,134 ft²
92 m²996 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
2 m9 ft
Height
11 m36 ft
10 m34 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
68,000 kg149,914 lbs
51,800 kg114,199 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56General Electric GE34
Max Thrust Per Engine
98 kN22,000 lbf
89 kN20,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
196 kN44,000 lbf
178 kN40,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
20,100 l5,310 gal
16,150 l4,266 gal
Range
3,850 km2,079 nm
4,537 km2,450 nm
Cruise Speed
796 km/h495 mph
829 km/h515 mph
Typical Seating
144 pax100 pax
Max Seating
188 pax114 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-400 and Embraer E190

Boeing 737-400 vs Embraer E190 Size Comparison

  • At 36.50 meters, the Boeing 737-400 is 0.20 meters longer than the Embraer E190.
  • With a wingspan of 28.80 meters, the Boeing 737-400 is 0.10 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-400 and Embraer E190 have heights of 11.10 meters and 10.60 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-400 0.50 meters taller.

Boeing 737-400 vs Embraer E190 Range

  • Embraer E190’s range of 4,537 kilometers is greater than Boeing 737-400’s range of 3,850 kilometers. Therefore, the Embraer E190 can fly nonstop approximately 687 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-400 can hold 5,310 gallons of fuel, which is 1,044 gallons more than the Embraer E190’s tank capacity of 4,266 gallons.

Boeing 737-400 vs Embraer E190 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-400 can accommodate 144 passengers, which is about 44 passengers more than Embraer E190’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-400’s max seating capacity is 188 passengers, compared to 114 passengers of the Embraer E190.

About the Boeing 737-400

The Boeing 737-400, part of the 737 Classic series, is a narrow-body, twin-engine airliner developed to meet the evolving requirements of the short to medium-haul market. First introduced in 1988, the 737-400 expanded upon the success of its predecessor, the 737-300. The -400 variant entered manufacturing shortly after finalization of design plans between Boeing and launch customer Piedmont Airlines (later merged into US Airways). It gives increased capacity and range, offering an option in between Boeing's 737-300 and the 757-200.

The fuselage incorporated a key 8 foot expansion to enable typical accommodation for up to 170 passengers in a 2-class layout. Other changes included increased weights and structural reinforcements, enhanced avionics/flight controls, and higher thrust CFM powerplants required for the heavier max takeoff figures. Cost efficiencies were achieved keeping cockpit continuity with the ubiquitous 737 flight deck suite.

Spanning 119.6 feet (36.5 meters) in length with a wingspan of 94.5 feet (28.8 meters), the 737-400 was designed to accommodate the growing demand for larger single-aisle aircraft. The aircraft typically seats 144 passengers, providing more space and comfort compared to earlier models in the series. This increased capacity made the 737-400 an attractive option for airlines seeking to transport more passengers on popular routes, without the need for a larger, wide-body aircraft. Equipped with two CFM International CFM56-3C1 engines, the 737-400 delivers a total thrust of 44,000 lbf (196.0 kN). This engine configuration, combined with a fuel capacity of 5,310 US gallons (20,100 liters), allows the aircraft to achieve a range of 2,079 nautical miles (3,850 kilometers).

In the competitive commercial aviation market of its time, the Boeing 737-400 contended with models like the McDonnell Douglas MD-80 series. Its introduction marked another milestone for Boeing in the evolution of the 737 family, solidifying the company's position in the market for short to medium-haul airliners. Airlines such as Alaska Airlines, Turkish Airlines, and British Airways incorporated the Boeing 737-400 into their fleets. The aircraft's operational role was significant, enabling these carriers to expand their route networks and increase flight frequencies, particularly in domestic and regional markets.

About the Embraer E190

Introduced in 2004, the Embraer E190 is a larger member of the E-Jet family, offering expanded capabilities for regional airlines. As a narrow-body regional jet, the E190 addresses a unique segment of the market, combining increased passenger capacity with the operational flexibility required for regional routes.

At 36.3 meters (118.9 feet) in length, the E190 stands as one of the bigger variants within the E-Jet family. This additional length not only provides more cabin space but also enhances the aircraft's payload and range capabilities. The E190 is equipped with GE engines that offer a combined thrust of 178.0 kN (40,000 lbf). Additionaly, its MTOW of 51,800 kg (114,199 lb) is significantly more than that of the E170/175. With a range of approximately 4,537 kilometers (2,450 nautical miles), the E190 is adept at connecting regional destinations with the efficiency and speed required in modern air travel.

The E190's cabin can comfortably accommodate 100 passengers in a standard configuration, scaling up to 114 passengers in a denser layout. The interior design of the E190 emphasizes passenger comfort, integrating features such as advanced climate control, ergonomic seating, and modern in-flight entertainment options. These elements collectively ensure a pleasant and relaxing journey for passengers, even on longer regional trips.

In its market segment, the Embraer E190 offers a balance of efficiency and capacity that competes with other regional jets and smaller mainline aircraft. Its operational profile makes it a compelling choice for airlines looking to bridge the gap between traditional regional jets and larger single-aisle aircraft. Airlines such as JetBlue (launch customer), KLM Cityhopper, Air Canada, and Georgian Airways have integrated the E190 into their fleets. The aircraft enables these airlines to serve a diverse array of routes, from high-density short-haul sectors to less frequented longer regional routes. In 2018, early production E190s were valued at less than $10 million, while the newer units were worth about $30 million.

The Embraer E190 represents a significant advancement in the regional jet category, offering airlines an aircraft that extends the boundaries of traditional regional aviation. Its combination of enhanced capacity, range, and passenger-focused features make it a valuable asset for airlines seeking to optimize their regional operations while providing high levels of passenger satisfaction.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.