Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-400 vs. Bombardier CRJ-1000

vs.
Compare

737-400

vs.

CRJ-1000

Price (USD)
$50 Million$49 Million
First Flight
19882009
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
36 m119 ft
39 m128 ft
Wingspan
28 m94 ft
26 m86 ft
Wing Area
105 m²1,134 ft²
77 m²833 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
11 m36 ft
7 m24 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
68,000 kg149,914 lbs
41,600 kg91,712 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56General Electric CF34
Max Thrust Per Engine
98 kN22,000 lbf
64 kN14,500 lbf
Max Total Thrust
196 kN44,000 lbf
129 kN29,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
20,100 l5,310 gal
11,700 l3,091 gal
Range
3,850 km2,079 nm
3,056 km1,650 nm
Cruise Speed
796 km/h495 mph
830 km/h516 mph
Typical Seating
144 pax97 pax
Max Seating
188 pax104 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-400 and Bombardier CRJ-1000

Boeing 737-400 vs Bombardier CRJ-1000 Size Comparison

  • At 39.10 meters, the Bombardier CRJ-1000 is 2.60 meters longer than the Boeing 737-400.
  • With a wingspan of 28.80 meters, the Boeing 737-400 is 2.60 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-400 and Bombardier CRJ-1000 have heights of 11.10 meters and 7.50 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-400 3.60 meters taller.

Boeing 737-400 vs Bombardier CRJ-1000 Range

  • Boeing 737-400’s range of 3,850 kilometers is greater than Bombardier CRJ-1000’s range of 3,056 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 737-400 can fly nonstop approximately 794 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-400 can hold 5,310 gallons of fuel, which is 2,219 gallons more than the Bombardier CRJ-1000’s tank capacity of 3,091 gallons.

Boeing 737-400 vs Bombardier CRJ-1000 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-400 can accommodate 144 passengers, which is about 47 passengers more than Bombardier CRJ-1000’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-400’s max seating capacity is 188 passengers, compared to 104 passengers of the Bombardier CRJ-1000.

About the Boeing 737-400

The Boeing 737-400, part of the 737 Classic series, is a narrow-body, twin-engine airliner developed to meet the evolving requirements of the short to medium-haul market. First introduced in 1988, the 737-400 expanded upon the success of its predecessor, the 737-300. The -400 variant entered manufacturing shortly after finalization of design plans between Boeing and launch customer Piedmont Airlines (later merged into US Airways). It gives increased capacity and range, offering an option in between Boeing's 737-300 and the 757-200.

The fuselage incorporated a key 8 foot expansion to enable typical accommodation for up to 170 passengers in a 2-class layout. Other changes included increased weights and structural reinforcements, enhanced avionics/flight controls, and higher thrust CFM powerplants required for the heavier max takeoff figures. Cost efficiencies were achieved keeping cockpit continuity with the ubiquitous 737 flight deck suite.

Spanning 119.6 feet (36.5 meters) in length with a wingspan of 94.5 feet (28.8 meters), the 737-400 was designed to accommodate the growing demand for larger single-aisle aircraft. The aircraft typically seats 144 passengers, providing more space and comfort compared to earlier models in the series. This increased capacity made the 737-400 an attractive option for airlines seeking to transport more passengers on popular routes, without the need for a larger, wide-body aircraft. Equipped with two CFM International CFM56-3C1 engines, the 737-400 delivers a total thrust of 44,000 lbf (196.0 kN). This engine configuration, combined with a fuel capacity of 5,310 US gallons (20,100 liters), allows the aircraft to achieve a range of 2,079 nautical miles (3,850 kilometers).

In the competitive commercial aviation market of its time, the Boeing 737-400 contended with models like the McDonnell Douglas MD-80 series. Its introduction marked another milestone for Boeing in the evolution of the 737 family, solidifying the company's position in the market for short to medium-haul airliners. Airlines such as Alaska Airlines, Turkish Airlines, and British Airways incorporated the Boeing 737-400 into their fleets. The aircraft's operational role was significant, enabling these carriers to expand their route networks and increase flight frequencies, particularly in domestic and regional markets.

About the Bombardier CRJ-1000

The Bombardier CRJ-1000, the largest member of the Canadair Regional Jet series, is a narrow-body regional jet designed to serve short to medium-haul routes. First flown in 2009, the CRJ-1000 was developed as an elongated version of the CRJ-900, offering increased passenger capacity and enhanced range capabilities to meet the demands of regional airlines.

With the stretched fuselage, the CRJ-1000 measures in at 39.1 meters (128.4 feet), making it about 3 meters longer than the -900. It also features a slightly larger wingspan of 26.2 meters (86.0 feet). Equipped with two General Electric CF34 engines, the CRJ-1000 delivers a total maximum thrust of 129.0 kN (29,000 lbf), providing it with a range of approximately 3,056 kilometers (1,650 nautical miles). This range, along with the aircraft's fuel efficiency, makes it a practical option for airlines to operate longer regional routes while maintaining cost-effectiveness.

The cabin of the CRJ-1000 is designed to seat around 97 passengers in a standard layout, with a maximum capacity of 104 passengers in a high-density arrangement. The interior focuses on passenger comfort, offering amenities typical of regional jets, including comfortable seating, overhead storage, and standard in-flight services. The cabin layout is intended to facilitate quick boarding and deplaning, a key aspect for maintaining the tight schedules of regional air travel.

In the regional aircraft market, the Bombardier CRJ-1000 competes with other regional jets such as the Embraer E-Jets series. Its introduction served to address the market segment's need for larger regional jets that could offer more seats and improved performance compared to earlier models. Airlines that operate the CRJ-1000 include Air Nostrum, Binter Canarias, and Garuda Indonesia. These carriers utilize the CRJ-1000's strengths in their regional route networks, benefiting from its ability to efficiently connect smaller airports with larger travel hubs while offering enhanced passenger capacity.

In summary, the Bombardier CRJ-1000's production and service history underscore its role as an important aircraft in the regional aviation market. Its design and capabilities align with the needs of regional airlines, offering an efficient and practical solution for connecting communities and fostering accessibility to air travel across regional networks.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.