Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-400 vs. ATR 42-600

vs.
Compare

737-400

vs.

42-600

Price (USD)
$50 Million$20 Million
First Flight
19881984
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
36 m119 ft
22 m74 ft
Wingspan
28 m94 ft
24 m80 ft
Wing Area
105 m²1,134 ft²
54 m²586 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
2 m8 ft
Height
11 m36 ft
7 m24 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
68,000 kg149,914 lbs
18,600 kg41,006 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100
Max Thrust Per Engine
98 kN22,000 lbf
1,800 kW2,400 shp
Max Total Thrust
196 kN44,000 lbf
3,600 kW4,800 shp
Fuel Capacity
20,100 l5,310 gal
5,730 l1,514 gal
Range
3,850 km2,079 nm
1,326 km716 nm
Cruise Speed
796 km/h495 mph
556 km/h345 mph
Typical Seating
144 pax44 pax
Max Seating
188 pax50 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-400 and ATR 42-600

Boeing 737-400 vs ATR 42-600 Size Comparison

  • At 36.50 meters, the Boeing 737-400 is 13.80 meters longer than the ATR 42-600.
  • With a wingspan of 28.80 meters, the Boeing 737-400 is 4.20 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-400 and ATR 42-600 have heights of 11.10 meters and 7.60 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-400 3.50 meters taller.

Boeing 737-400 vs ATR 42-600 Range

  • Boeing 737-400’s range of 3,850 kilometers is greater than ATR 42-600’s range of 1,326 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 737-400 can fly nonstop approximately 2,524 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-400 can hold 5,310 gallons of fuel, which is 3,796 gallons more than the ATR 42-600’s tank capacity of 1,514 gallons.

Boeing 737-400 vs ATR 42-600 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-400 can accommodate 144 passengers, which is about 100 passengers more than ATR 42-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-400’s max seating capacity is 188 passengers, compared to 50 passengers of the ATR 42-600.

About the Boeing 737-400

The Boeing 737-400, part of the 737 Classic series, is a narrow-body, twin-engine airliner developed to meet the evolving requirements of the short to medium-haul market. First introduced in 1988, the 737-400 expanded upon the success of its predecessor, the 737-300. The -400 variant entered manufacturing shortly after finalization of design plans between Boeing and launch customer Piedmont Airlines (later merged into US Airways). It gives increased capacity and range, offering an option in between Boeing's 737-300 and the 757-200.

The fuselage incorporated a key 8 foot expansion to enable typical accommodation for up to 170 passengers in a 2-class layout. Other changes included increased weights and structural reinforcements, enhanced avionics/flight controls, and higher thrust CFM powerplants required for the heavier max takeoff figures. Cost efficiencies were achieved keeping cockpit continuity with the ubiquitous 737 flight deck suite.

Spanning 119.6 feet (36.5 meters) in length with a wingspan of 94.5 feet (28.8 meters), the 737-400 was designed to accommodate the growing demand for larger single-aisle aircraft. The aircraft typically seats 144 passengers, providing more space and comfort compared to earlier models in the series. This increased capacity made the 737-400 an attractive option for airlines seeking to transport more passengers on popular routes, without the need for a larger, wide-body aircraft. Equipped with two CFM International CFM56-3C1 engines, the 737-400 delivers a total thrust of 44,000 lbf (196.0 kN). This engine configuration, combined with a fuel capacity of 5,310 US gallons (20,100 liters), allows the aircraft to achieve a range of 2,079 nautical miles (3,850 kilometers).

In the competitive commercial aviation market of its time, the Boeing 737-400 contended with models like the McDonnell Douglas MD-80 series. Its introduction marked another milestone for Boeing in the evolution of the 737 family, solidifying the company's position in the market for short to medium-haul airliners. Airlines such as Alaska Airlines, Turkish Airlines, and British Airways incorporated the Boeing 737-400 into their fleets. The aircraft's operational role was significant, enabling these carriers to expand their route networks and increase flight frequencies, particularly in domestic and regional markets.

About the ATR 42-600

The ATR 42-600 is a twin-engine, turboprop aircraft is designed for regional travel. Its role in the aviation industry focuses on connecting regional and remote areas, making air travel accessible to smaller communities. The ATR 42 is most recognizable by its high-wing design , T-tail, and propeller engines.

The ATR 42 was originally introduced in 1984, with the -600 variant beginning flight in 2010. The -600 comes in at 22.7 meters (74.4 feet) long with a wingspan of 24.6 meters (80.6 feet). Its wing area of 54.5 square meters (586.6 square feet) is designed to provide efficient lift for short-runway takeoffs and landings. With a typical seating arrangement for 44 passengers, the ATR 42-600 is an optimal choice for airlines serving regional routes with lower passenger volumes. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney Canada PW120s, the aircraft delivers a total output of 3222 kW (4,320 shp), ensuring reliable performance for its operational requirements. The ATR 42-600 has a fuel capacity of 5,730 liters (1,514 US gallons), contributing to its range of 1,326 kilometers (716 nautical miles). Its cruise speed of 556 km/h (345 mph) enables efficient travel times for regional connections.

In the competitive landscape of regional aviation, the ATR 42-600 contends with aircraft like the Bombardier Q400, Fokker 50, an Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia. Its appeal lies in its operational efficiency and suitability for short-haul routes, particularly in regions where larger jet aircraft are not viable. Airlines that have integrated the ATR 42-600 into their fleets include Silver Airways and Logan Air. These carriers utilize the aircraft to serve regional networks, capitalizing on its capacity to operate efficiently on shorter routes and provide essential connectivity.

The development of the ATR 42-600 was driven by the growing need for efficient, reliable aircraft in the regional market. Its introduction into service has been instrumental in expanding the reach of air travel to smaller markets, underscoring the importance of regional connectivity in the broader aviation industry.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.