Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-300 vs. Boeing 737-900ER

vs.
Compare

737-300

vs.

737-900ER

Price (USD)
$45 Million$102 Million
First Flight
19842006
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
33 m109 ft
42 m138 ft
Wingspan
28 m94 ft
34 m112 ft
Wing Area
105 m²1,134 ft²
124 m²1,341 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
3 m12 ft
Height
11 m36 ft
12 m41 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
63,300 kg139,553 lbs
85,100 kg187,613 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56CFMI CFM56
Max Thrust Per Engine
98 kN22,000 lbf
126 kN28,400 lbf
Max Total Thrust
196 kN44,000 lbf
252 kN56,800 lbf
Fuel Capacity
20,100 l5,310 gal
29,700 l7,846 gal
Range
4,400 km2,376 nm
5,900 km3,186 nm
Cruise Speed
796 km/h495 mph
850 km/h528 mph
Typical Seating
128 pax180 pax
Max Seating
149 pax215 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-300 and Boeing 737-900ER

Boeing 737-300 vs Boeing 737-900ER Size Comparison

  • At 42.10 meters, the Boeing 737-900ER is 8.70 meters longer than the Boeing 737-300.
  • With a wingspan of 34.30 meters, the Boeing 737-900ER is 5.50 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-300 and Boeing 737-900ER have heights of 11.10 meters and 12.60 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-900ER 1.50 meters taller.

Boeing 737-300 vs Boeing 737-900ER Range

  • Boeing 737-900ER’s range of 5,900 kilometers is greater than Boeing 737-300’s range of 4,400 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 737-900ER can fly nonstop approximately 1,500 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER can hold 7,846 gallons of fuel, which is 2,536 gallons more than the Boeing 737-300’s tank capacity of 5,310 gallons.

Boeing 737-300 vs Boeing 737-900ER Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-900ER can accommodate 180 passengers, which is about 52 passengers more than Boeing 737-300’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER’s max seating capacity is 215 passengers, compared to 149 passengers of the Boeing 737-300.

About the Boeing 737-300

The Boeing 737-300, launched in the early 1980s, is a seminal model in the 737 family, known for ushering in the era of modern narrow-body jetliners. As the first of the 737 Classic series, it was developed to meet the growing demand for more efficient and higher-capacity short to medium-haul aircraft. Compared to the Original 737 models, the -300 featured new wings, a redesigned tailfin, and improvements inside the cabin. Fast forward a bit, the 737-300 was eventually replaced by the 737-700 of the Next Generation series.

The 737-300 stretches 109.6 feet (33.4 meters) from nose to tail, with a wingspan of 94.5 feet (28.8 meters). This aircraft was Boeing's answer to the need for a larger capacity in the single-aisle market, accommodating 128 passengers in a typical two-class layout. Its increased length over its predecessor, the 737-200, allowed for additional seating, making it a more economical choice for airlines.

Equipped with two CFM International CFM56-3B1 engines, the 737-300 produces a total thrust of 44,000 lbf (196.0 kN). This enhancement in power, combined with a fuel capacity of 5,310 US gallons (20,100 liters), extended the aircraft's range to 2,376 nautical miles (4,400 kilometers). The 737-300's cruise speed of 495 mph (796 km/h) made it a swift and efficient option for airlines, reducing flight times on popular domestic and regional routes.

The 737-300 marked a shift in the commercial aviation landscape, competing with models like the McDonnell Douglas MD-80. Its launch was pivotal for Boeing, demonstrating the company's ability to innovate and adapt to market shifts. The 737-300's popularity was driven by its improved efficiency, greater capacity, and enhanced performance, meeting the needs of airlines expanding their short-haul operations.

Major carriers such as Southwest Airlines and United Airlines incorporated the Boeing 737-300 into their fleets, capitalizing on its operational advantages. The American carriers purchased a majority of the -300, with 299 units between the two airlines. The aircraft's role in these fleets was significant, as it enabled airlines to offer more frequent services and open new routes, particularly in the domestic and regional markets.

About the Boeing 737-900ER

Introduced in 2006, the Boeing 737-900ER is a pivotal variant in the Next-Generation 737 series, offering airlines an ideal combination of extended range and increased passenger capacity for medium to long-haul routes. This aircraft, building upon the base model of the 737-900, incorporates significant advancements that enhance its operational flexibility and efficiency.

The 737-900ER's design extends to a length of 42.1 meters (138.1 feet), making it one of the longest aircraft in the 737 family. This extended fuselage allows for a higher passenger capacity, aligning with the growing demands for more economically efficient, high-density configurations in commercial aviation. Its wingspan of 34.3 meters (112.6 feet) and a wing area of 124.6 square meters (1341.0 square feet) contribute to the aircraft's aerodynamic performance. Equipped with powerful engines providing a total maximum thrust of 252.0 kN (56,800 lbf), the 737-900ER is well-suited for extended range operations, further enhancing its versatility for various route profiles. With a fuel capacity of 29,700 liters (7,846 US gallons), the aircraft achieves a range of approximately 5,900 kilometers (3,186 nautical miles), enabling it to operate longer routes previously beyond the reach of standard single-aisle aircraft.

The interior of the 737-900ER is configured to accommodate up to 180 passengers in a typical two-class setting, with the capability to seat up to 215 passengers in a denser, single-class arrangement. This flexibility makes the 737-900ER an adaptable solution for airlines to cater to different market demands. The cabin design focuses on enhancing passenger comfort, integrating modern amenities and spacious seating arrangements.

In the competitive landscape of commercial aviation, the 737-900ER stands out as a cost-effective option for airlines to service a wide spectrum of domestic and international routes. Operators such as Alaska Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and United Airlines have integrated the 737-900ER into their fleets, utilizing its operational efficiency and capacity to bolster and diversify their route networks. The closest alternative airliner to the 737-900ER in the Airbus A321neo.

Overall, the Boeing 737-900ER marks a significant evolution in the 737 series, bringing together the benefits of extended range and increased capacity while upholding the operational efficiency and reliability that the Next-Generation 737s are known for. Its role in the fleets of global airlines underscores its status as a versatile and efficient choice for medium to long-haul air travel.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.