Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-200 vs. Boeing 737-900ER

vs.
Compare

737-200

vs.

737-900ER

Price (USD)
$5 Million$102 Million
First Flight
19672006
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
30 m100 ft
42 m138 ft
Wingspan
28 m93 ft
34 m112 ft
Wing Area
102 m²1,097 ft²
124 m²1,341 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
3 m12 ft
Height
11 m36 ft
12 m41 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
58,100 kg128,089 lbs
85,100 kg187,613 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney JT8DCFMI CFM56
Max Thrust Per Engine
73 kN16,400 lbf
126 kN28,400 lbf
Max Total Thrust
146 kN32,800 lbf
252 kN56,800 lbf
Fuel Capacity
22,600 l5,970 gal
29,700 l7,846 gal
Range
4,260 km2,300 nm
5,900 km3,186 nm
Cruise Speed
796 km/h495 mph
850 km/h528 mph
Typical Seating
112 pax180 pax
Max Seating
136 pax215 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-200 and Boeing 737-900ER

Boeing 737-200 vs Boeing 737-900ER Size Comparison

  • At 42.10 meters, the Boeing 737-900ER is 11.60 meters longer than the Boeing 737-200.
  • With a wingspan of 34.30 meters, the Boeing 737-900ER is 5.90 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-200 and Boeing 737-900ER have heights of 11.20 meters and 12.60 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-900ER 1.40 meters taller.

Boeing 737-200 vs Boeing 737-900ER Range

  • Boeing 737-900ER’s range of 5,900 kilometers is greater than Boeing 737-200’s range of 4,260 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 737-900ER can fly nonstop approximately 1,640 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER can hold 7,846 gallons of fuel, which is 1,876 gallons more than the Boeing 737-200’s tank capacity of 5,970 gallons.

Boeing 737-200 vs Boeing 737-900ER Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 737-900ER can accommodate 180 passengers, which is about 68 passengers more than Boeing 737-200’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER’s max seating capacity is 215 passengers, compared to 136 passengers of the Boeing 737-200.

About the Boeing 737-200

The Boeing 737-200 is a narrow-body, twin-engine jetliner renowned for its role in shaping the short to medium-haul market. Developed in the late 1960s, the 737-200 extended the capabilities of the original 737-100, offering airlines a versatile and reliable option for their domestic and regional networks.

Measuring 100.2 feet (30.5 meters) in length and with a wingspan of 93.0 feet (28.4 meters), the Boeing 737-200 was designed to operate efficiently in a variety of airport environments, including those with shorter runways. It typically accommodates 112 passengers, providing a balance between capacity and comfort, which made it popular among airlines for its operational flexibility. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney JT8D engines, the 737-200 delivers a total thrust of 32,800 lbf (146.0 kN). The aircraft's fuel capacity of 5,970 US gallons (22,600 liters) supports a range of 2,300 nautical miles (4,260 kilometers), making it suitable for a range of short to medium-haul routes. The 737-200's cruise speed of 495 mph (796 km/h) contributed to reducing travel times compared to older generation aircraft, enhancing the efficiency of air travel.

In its time, the Boeing 737-200 competed with aircraft like the Douglas DC-9, offering airlines an alternative in the growing market for jet-powered short-haul travel. Its introduction was a key moment in Boeing's history, solidifying the company's position as a leading manufacturer of commercial jetliners. The 737-200 saw widespread use among airlines globally, including carriers such as United Airlines, Lufthansa, and Air Canada. Its operational role was significant in expanding airline routes and increasing the frequency of flights, contributing to the growth of the airline industry and making air travel more accessible.

While the production of the Boeing 737-200 has long ceased, its legacy in the aviation industry remains impactful. The aircraft's development marked an era of transition and innovation in commercial aviation, paving the way for future advancements in aircraft technology and design. US-based airlines ceased operations with the -200 back in 2008. In 2023, a handful of international carriers still operated the variant for commercial flights.

About the Boeing 737-900ER

Introduced in 2006, the Boeing 737-900ER is a pivotal variant in the Next-Generation 737 series, offering airlines an ideal combination of extended range and increased passenger capacity for medium to long-haul routes. This aircraft, building upon the base model of the 737-900, incorporates significant advancements that enhance its operational flexibility and efficiency.

The 737-900ER's design extends to a length of 42.1 meters (138.1 feet), making it one of the longest aircraft in the 737 family. This extended fuselage allows for a higher passenger capacity, aligning with the growing demands for more economically efficient, high-density configurations in commercial aviation. Its wingspan of 34.3 meters (112.6 feet) and a wing area of 124.6 square meters (1341.0 square feet) contribute to the aircraft's aerodynamic performance. Equipped with powerful engines providing a total maximum thrust of 252.0 kN (56,800 lbf), the 737-900ER is well-suited for extended range operations, further enhancing its versatility for various route profiles. With a fuel capacity of 29,700 liters (7,846 US gallons), the aircraft achieves a range of approximately 5,900 kilometers (3,186 nautical miles), enabling it to operate longer routes previously beyond the reach of standard single-aisle aircraft.

The interior of the 737-900ER is configured to accommodate up to 180 passengers in a typical two-class setting, with the capability to seat up to 215 passengers in a denser, single-class arrangement. This flexibility makes the 737-900ER an adaptable solution for airlines to cater to different market demands. The cabin design focuses on enhancing passenger comfort, integrating modern amenities and spacious seating arrangements.

In the competitive landscape of commercial aviation, the 737-900ER stands out as a cost-effective option for airlines to service a wide spectrum of domestic and international routes. Operators such as Alaska Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and United Airlines have integrated the 737-900ER into their fleets, utilizing its operational efficiency and capacity to bolster and diversify their route networks. The closest alternative airliner to the 737-900ER in the Airbus A321neo.

Overall, the Boeing 737-900ER marks a significant evolution in the 737 series, bringing together the benefits of extended range and increased capacity while upholding the operational efficiency and reliability that the Next-Generation 737s are known for. Its role in the fleets of global airlines underscores its status as a versatile and efficient choice for medium to long-haul air travel.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.