Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 727-200 vs. Boeing 767-300ER

vs.
Compare

727-200

vs.

767-300ER

Price (USD)
$4 Million$105 Million
First Flight
19671986
Body Type
Narrow-bodyWide-body
Length
46 m153 ft
54 m180 ft
Wingspan
32 m108 ft
47 m156 ft
Wing Area
153 m²1,646 ft²
283 m²3,049 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
5 m16 ft
Height
10 m34 ft
15 m51 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
78,100 kg172,181 lbs
186,900 kg412,044 lbs
Number of Engines
32
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney JT8DPratt & Whitney PW4000 / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211
Max Thrust Per Engine
67 kN15,000 lbf
274 kN61,500 lbf
Max Total Thrust
201 kN45,000 lbf
548 kN123,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
30,600 l8,084 gal
90,700 l23,960 gal
Range
3,500 km1,890 nm
11,070 km5,977 nm
Cruise Speed
865 km/h537 mph
850 km/h528 mph
Typical Seating
145 pax261 pax
Max Seating
189 pax351 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 727-200 and Boeing 767-300ER

Boeing 727-200 vs Boeing 767-300ER Size Comparison

  • At 54.90 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 8.20 meters longer than the Boeing 727-200.
  • With a wingspan of 47.60 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 14.70 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 727-200 and Boeing 767-300ER have heights of 10.70 meters and 15.80 meters respectively - making the Boeing 767-300ER 5.10 meters taller.

Boeing 727-200 vs Boeing 767-300ER Range

  • Boeing 767-300ER’s range of 11,070 kilometers is greater than Boeing 727-200’s range of 3,500 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 767-300ER can fly nonstop approximately 7,570 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER can hold 23,960 gallons of fuel, which is 15,876 gallons more than the Boeing 727-200’s tank capacity of 8,084 gallons.

Boeing 727-200 vs Boeing 767-300ER Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-300ER can accommodate 261 passengers, which is about 116 passengers more than Boeing 727-200’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER’s max seating capacity is 351 passengers, compared to 189 passengers of the Boeing 727-200.

About the Boeing 727-200

The Boeing 727-200 is a narrow-body, trijet airliner that played a significant role in the expansion of commercial air travel. First introduced in 1967, the 727 was designed for short to medium-haul routes.

The -200 variant of the Boeing 727 measures in at 153.1 feet (46.7 meters) long, with a wingspan of 108.0 feet (32.9 meters). This size makes it well-suited for operations at regional and domestic airports. The aircraft typically accommodates 145 passengers. In a two class-configuration, first class has 4 seats abreast, with a 3-3 seating layout in the back. Sporting three engines, the 727-200 delivers a total thrust of 45,000 lbf (201.0 kN). It has a fuel capacity of 8,084 US gallons (30,600 liters), supporting a range of 1,890 nautical miles (3,500 kilometers). With a cruise speed of 537 mph (865 km/h), the 727-200 was known for its ability to efficiently cover distances within its operational scope.

In the commercial aviation market, the Boeing 727-200 competed with aircraft like the Douglas DC-9 and the early Airbus A320 series. Its trijet configuration was unique for its time, offering an optimal balance of performance and efficiency for short and medium-haul flights. Major US-based airlines such as American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and United Airlines all operated the Boeing 727-200. The trijet was also a part of a fleet for Iberia, Lufthansa, All Nippon Airways, and Air France.

The Boeing 727-200's development and introduction into the market were indicative of the era's aviation trends, focusing on creating more efficient and versatile aircraft for a growing industry. Its production history reflects Boeing's ability to innovate and adapt to changing airline needs, particularly in the regional and short-haul segments. The Boeing 727-200 is no longer in production, and very few our left in commercial aviation. The aircraft's contribution to the expansion of regional air travel is very notable, showcasing the evolution of aircraft design and technology to meet the demands of an increasingly connected world.

About the Boeing 767-300ER

The Boeing 767-300ER, an extended-range variant of the 767 family, entered service in 1988 as a response to the growing demand for efficient and versatile wide-body aircraft. This model, with its significant enhancements in range and capacity, has become a staple in the fleets of various airlines for long-haul operations. At its peak in the 1990's, a brand new 767-300ER was valued at roughly $85 million.

With a length of 54.9 meters (180.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet), the 767-300ER is designed for operational efficiency in both airport compatibility and aerodynamics. The wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet) contributes to the aircraft's stable and efficient flight characteristics, especially over extended distances.

The -300ER's increased range was made possible by larger fuel tanks and a higher max takeoff weight (MTOW) of 407,000 lbs (185,000 kgs). The updated variant has a fuel capacity of 90,700 liters (23,960 US gallons), allowing it to cover distances of up to 11,070 kilometers (5,977 nautical miles). This capability makes it particularly suitable for transcontinental and transoceanic routes, offering airlines the flexibility to connect distant cities with fewer stops. Engines options for the -300ER included Pratt & Whitney PW4000s, General Electric CF6s, or Rolls-Royce RB211s. These were capable of a total maximum thrust of 548.0 kN (123,000 lbf). The aircraft exhibits robust performance, necessary for long-haul flights carrying a full load of both passengers and cargo.

The cabin of the 767-300ER is designed to typically seat 261 passengers in a dual-class layout, with the potential to accommodate up to 351 passengers in a high-density configuration. The typical layout includes a spacious business class and a larger economy class, often arranged in a 2-3-2 seat configuration, balancing passenger comfort and density.

Competing in the wide-body market, the Boeing 767-300ER has faced competition from aircraft such as the Airbus A330 and the smaller A300. These models offer similar long-range capabilities and passenger capacities, making the market segment highly competitive. Many carriers have operated the 767-300ER, including Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, British Airways, Japan Airlines, and All Nippon Airways. These carriers have leveraged the aircraft's range and capacity to effectively serve a variety of long-haul routes, underlining its role as a versatile and reliable option in their fleet.

The Boeing 767-300ER's introduction and subsequent service record reflect its importance in the evolution of wide-body aircraft, particularly in the context of long-haul commercial aviation. Its combination of range, capacity, and operational flexibility has solidified its position as a significant player in the global aviation industry.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.